What's Happening In the World?

A forum for creative people.

Re: What's Happening In the World?

Postby Garrett Gilchrist » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:51 am

http://www.colby.edu/lovejoyaward/past- ... n-address/

It is difficult to recognize the limits a society places on accepted thought at the time it is doing it. When everyone accepts basic assumptions, they don’t seem to be constraints on ideas. That truth often only reveals itself in hindsight.

And so today, those who really challenge the basic assumptions of the modern American society are often considered just as dangerous, just as criminal, as the abolitionists.

The conventional wisdom of our day is the belief that we have had to change the nature of our society to accommodate the global war on terror. Incrementally over the last thirteen years, Americans have easily accepted a transformation of their way of life because they have been told that it is necessary to keep them safe. Americans now slip off their shoes on command at airports, have accepted the secret targeted killings of other Americans without due process, have accepted the use of torture and the creation of secret offshore prisons, have accepted mass surveillance of their personal communications, and accepted the longest continual period of war in American history. Meanwhile, the government has eagerly prosecuted whistleblowers who try to bring any of the government’s actions to light.

Americans have accepted this new reality with hardly a murmur. Today, the basic prerequisite to being taken seriously in American politics is to accept the legitimacy of the new national security state that has been created since 9/11. The new basic American assumption is that there really is a need for a global war on terror. Anyone who doesn’t accept that basic assumption is considered dangerous and maybe even a traitor.

Today, the U.S. government treats whistleblowers as criminals, much like Elijah Lovejoy, because they want to reveal uncomfortable truths about the government’s actions. And the public and the mainstream press often accept and champion the government’s approach, viewing whistleblowers as dangerous fringe characters because they are not willing to follow orders and remain silent.

The crackdown on leaks by first the Bush administration and more aggressively by the Obama administration, targeting both whistleblowers and journalists, has been designed to suppress the truth about the war on terror. This government campaign of censorship has come with the veneer of the law. Instead of mobs throwing printing presses in the Mississippi River, instead of the creation of the kind of “enemies lists” that President Richard Nixon kept, the Bush and Obama administrations have used the Department of Justice to do their bidding. But the effect is the same — the attorney general of the United States has been turned into the nation’s chief censorship officer. Whenever the White House or the intelligence community get angry about a story in the press, they turn to the Justice Department and the FBI and get them to start a criminal leak investigation, to make sure everybody shuts up.

What the White House wants is to establish limits on accepted reporting on national security and on the war on terror. By launching criminal investigations of stories that are outside the mainstream coverage, they are trying to, in effect, build a pathway on which journalism can be conducted. Stay on the interstate highway of conventional wisdom with your journalism, and you will have no problems. Try to get off and challenge basic assumptions, and you will face punishment.

Journalists have no choice but to fight back, because if they don’t they will become irrelevant.
User avatar
Garrett Gilchrist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:23 am



Re: What's Happening In the World?

Postby Garrett Gilchrist » Sun Oct 12, 2014 4:50 pm

“Of course, whether Obama opposes Internet “fast lanes” right now is immaterial since the only thing that matters is the opinion of Wheeler, who had served as president the National Cable Television Association in the 1980s and as CEO of CTIA until 2004, and who was confirmed as the new chairman of the FCC last year. If Obama really wanted to preserve net neutrality, then maybe he should have put a little more thought into appointing the public official most responsible for deciding its fate.”

http://bgr.com/2014/10/11/obama-fcc-net ... lity-plan/
User avatar
Garrett Gilchrist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:23 am


Re: What's Happening In the World?

Postby JustinHoskie » Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:45 pm

User avatar
JustinHoskie
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 11:07 pm

Re: What's Happening In the World?

Postby pauljthacker » Wed Oct 15, 2014 3:34 pm

The threat against Anita Sarkeesian is a good example of how crazy a small fraction of people are. If you want an example of how crazy some entire state governments are, consider that the reason she didn't go ahead with her speech as she has in similar instances is that, apparently, Utah state law dictated that the school had to allow concealed firearms at the event.

http://www.standard.net/Police/2014/10/ ... hreat.html

Here's a more in depth look at the Gamergate "movement" than I've typically seen:

http://deadspin.com/the-future-of-the-c ... 1646145844
pauljthacker
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:01 pm

Re: What's Happening In the World?

Postby Garrett Gilchrist » Thu Oct 16, 2014 3:02 pm

User avatar
Garrett Gilchrist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:23 am


Re: What's Happening In the World?

Postby Garrett Gilchrist » Thu Oct 23, 2014 4:06 pm

User avatar
Garrett Gilchrist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:23 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Big Round Room

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron